<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DigiCamReview.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digicamreview.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digicamreview.com</link>
	<description>All the latest digital camera reviews, news, help, tips, sample photos, links, advice, discussion, bargains, price watch, plus more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vivitar Vivicam 8225 Review &#8211; Do Not Buy! by iain</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2010/04/vivitar-vivicam-8225-review-do-not-buy.html/comment-page-1#comment-22736</link>
		<dc:creator>iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshwal.wordpress.com/2010/04/08/vivitar-vivicam-8225-review-do-not-buy#comment-22736</guid>
		<description>got one of theese vivitar8225, every timre i try to take a pic, it says card protected, protected from who? it&#039;s fekin mine ???? arggh how do i unprotect it then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got one of theese vivitar8225, every timre i try to take a pic, it says card protected, protected from who? it&#8217;s fekin mine ???? arggh how do i unprotect it then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Samsung WB600 Ultra Zoom Review by Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2011/05/samsung-wb600-ultra-zoom-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-22002</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicamreview.com/?p=17508#comment-22002</guid>
		<description>This camera is an excellent option, the image quality is suberb, very sharp with fantastic colours. In addition it has a lot of creative features. And the best of all is that all of them  can be operated in full manual mode, then you can take whole control of exposure (speed, aperture, iso, wb) and flash options, bracketing. At low Iso is very clear in night shots, the pictures are clean, sharp and have amazing colours. In conclusion, you can´t buy anything better for the price. I really love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This camera is an excellent option, the image quality is suberb, very sharp with fantastic colours. In addition it has a lot of creative features. And the best of all is that all of them  can be operated in full manual mode, then you can take whole control of exposure (speed, aperture, iso, wb) and flash options, bracketing. At low Iso is very clear in night shots, the pictures are clean, sharp and have amazing colours. In conclusion, you can´t buy anything better for the price. I really love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lightscribe CD DVD Labelling System by joes mama</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2006/03/lightscribe-cd-dvd-labelling-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-21618</link>
		<dc:creator>joes mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshwal.wordpress.com/2006/03/03/lightscribe-cd-dvd-labelling-system#comment-21618</guid>
		<description>lightscribe suckedballs when it was first created 10 years ago. And now? Well, it still sucksballs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lightscribe suckedballs when it was first created 10 years ago. And now? Well, it still sucksballs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony Cybershot DSC-M1 Review by Techiecop</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2005/06/sony-cybershot-dsc-m1-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-21286</link>
		<dc:creator>Techiecop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshwal.wordpress.com/2005/06/22/sony-cybershot-dsc-m1-review#comment-21286</guid>
		<description>Sony has never failed to design its models in a unique pattern. The cameras that it provides are not only unique, but also feature great in-built qualities which take it to the top-most level in the camera market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony has never failed to design its models in a unique pattern. The cameras that it provides are not only unique, but also feature great in-built qualities which take it to the top-most level in the camera market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kodak Easyshare M23, M5370, M5350, Z5010 Announced by Beverly Masterman</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2011/09/kodak-easyshare-m23-m5370-m5350-z5010-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-20858</link>
		<dc:creator>Beverly Masterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicamreview.com/?p=18078#comment-20858</guid>
		<description>I got my camera for Christmas and no instruction sheett/book, don&#039;t know where I can return it, can you PLEASE send me one??? PLEASE  Bev Masterman - Also I can&#039;t download it on my computer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got my camera for Christmas and no instruction sheett/book, don&#8217;t know where I can return it, can you PLEASE send me one??? PLEASE  Bev Masterman &#8211; Also I can&#8217;t download it on my computer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DCViews.com Closes It&#8217;s Doors. by Rob Schumann</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2011/07/dcviews-com-closes-its-doors.html/comment-page-1#comment-20799</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Schumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicamreview.com/?p=17996#comment-20799</guid>
		<description>Towards the end of 2011 DCViews was taken over and remains active, albeit under new management.

The site is currently in the process of redesign and some period of slow update, and related disruption, however the new owner is keen to not disappoint the existing audience, while also looking to attract new visitors and strengthen the community.

As the newowner says on the homepage:

&quot;I know change can be difficult and I promise to keep an open ear and please let me know of any questions, concerns or ideas that you may have.&quot;

So, DCViews has not gone away, but is undergoing a transition that will hopefully bring benefit to all who use the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Towards the end of 2011 DCViews was taken over and remains active, albeit under new management.</p>
<p>The site is currently in the process of redesign and some period of slow update, and related disruption, however the new owner is keen to not disappoint the existing audience, while also looking to attract new visitors and strengthen the community.</p>
<p>As the newowner says on the homepage:</p>
<p>&#8220;I know change can be difficult and I promise to keep an open ear and please let me know of any questions, concerns or ideas that you may have.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, DCViews has not gone away, but is undergoing a transition that will hopefully bring benefit to all who use the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Olympus T-10 Budget Camera only £39 by pal</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2011/02/olympus-t-10-budget-camera-only-39.html/comment-page-1#comment-20214</link>
		<dc:creator>pal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicamreview.com/?p=17483#comment-20214</guid>
		<description>re:batteries
it&#039;s a very funny problem... i had it with many previous Olympus models (since z2040). I believe that&#039;s the reason they switched to their own batteries. They couldn&#039;t find a solution for 1.5V&gt;1.2V downgrade per battery (or a sensor that will detect this). 

SOLUTION: Weird, but it behaves like a live being. Initially it doesn&#039;t like rechargeables. However, if you stop feeding it with alcalines, it will eventually accept rechargeables as a &quot;staple food&quot;. Some training and it&#039;ll work.  I managed to &quot;train&quot; all my Olympus cameras within weeks and with good quality Ni-MH (e.g. Sony 2100mA) you can expect a very significant battery life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re:batteries<br />
it&#8217;s a very funny problem&#8230; i had it with many previous Olympus models (since z2040). I believe that&#8217;s the reason they switched to their own batteries. They couldn&#8217;t find a solution for 1.5V&gt;1.2V downgrade per battery (or a sensor that will detect this). </p>
<p>SOLUTION: Weird, but it behaves like a live being. Initially it doesn&#8217;t like rechargeables. However, if you stop feeding it with alcalines, it will eventually accept rechargeables as a &#8220;staple food&#8221;. Some training and it&#8217;ll work.  I managed to &#8220;train&#8221; all my Olympus cameras within weeks and with good quality Ni-MH (e.g. Sony 2100mA) you can expect a very significant battery life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Samsung ST550 TL225 Review &#8211; This One&#8217;s Good! by Angel</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2010/04/samsung-st550-tl225-review-this-ones-good.html/comment-page-1#comment-20041</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshwal.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/samsung-st550-tl225-review-this-ones-good#comment-20041</guid>
		<description>hello dear sir!!!

i bought a samsung st550 and took some pics. on the hard drive of the camera , the only thing is , it didnt came with USB transfer cables. Is there anyway i can transfer them , or is there a cable that will be compatible with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello dear sir!!!</p>
<p>i bought a samsung st550 and took some pics. on the hard drive of the camera , the only thing is , it didnt came with USB transfer cables. Is there anyway i can transfer them , or is there a cable that will be compatible with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ricoh CX4 Review &#8211; Back for the 4th time! by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2010/11/ricoh-cx4-review-back-for-the-4th-time.html/comment-page-1#comment-19737</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 08:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicamreview.com/?p=16175#comment-19737</guid>
		<description>The CX5
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/ricoh-cx5-digital-camera-review-15753
and CX6 are even better with quicker focusing
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/ricoh-cx6-digital-compact-camera-review-18048</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CX5<br />
<a href="http://www.ephotozine.com/article/ricoh-cx5-digital-camera-review-15753" rel="nofollow">http://www.ephotozine.com/article/ricoh-cx5-digital-camera-review-15753</a><br />
and CX6 are even better with quicker focusing<br />
<a href="http://www.ephotozine.com/article/ricoh-cx6-digital-compact-camera-review-18048" rel="nofollow">http://www.ephotozine.com/article/ricoh-cx6-digital-compact-camera-review-18048</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ricoh CX4 Review &#8211; Back for the 4th time! by John W</title>
		<link>http://www.digicamreview.com/2010/11/ricoh-cx4-review-back-for-the-4th-time.html/comment-page-1#comment-19709</link>
		<dc:creator>John W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicamreview.com/?p=16175#comment-19709</guid>
		<description>I am interested in your review of the new(ish) Ricoh, their CX4. I had a CX1 but the lens motor stopped working (it wouldn&#039;t come out at switch-on). It was just out of guarantee and the shop charged me £25 to tell me that it couldn&#039;t be repaired economically. Against my deeper feelings I bought another the same because I had the case and two batteries. It took decent shots when it was working. I have now dropped my second CX1 and need to buy again. This time I have three batteries and the case to push the decision! The failure after dropping it is the same again - the lens won&#039;t move out at swictch on. Both cameras have also developed another fault in the short time (about 18months) that I&#039;ve used each of them: the zoom doesn&#039;t stop when I let go of the switch. I get there by jerking it back and forth until it stops in the right place. Seems like a generic weakness as both cameras did it. And, just for your interest, I find the mode control wheel infuriating - about 50% of the time I take a shot and find that the wheel has slipped round a couple of places in handling the camera. I can take it again - but occasionally I miss an unrepeatable shot because of it. Is it so good a camera - or should I be packing upon Ricoh and going elsewhere this time round, notwithstanding the case and all those batteries?

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in your review of the new(ish) Ricoh, their CX4. I had a CX1 but the lens motor stopped working (it wouldn&#8217;t come out at switch-on). It was just out of guarantee and the shop charged me £25 to tell me that it couldn&#8217;t be repaired economically. Against my deeper feelings I bought another the same because I had the case and two batteries. It took decent shots when it was working. I have now dropped my second CX1 and need to buy again. This time I have three batteries and the case to push the decision! The failure after dropping it is the same again &#8211; the lens won&#8217;t move out at swictch on. Both cameras have also developed another fault in the short time (about 18months) that I&#8217;ve used each of them: the zoom doesn&#8217;t stop when I let go of the switch. I get there by jerking it back and forth until it stops in the right place. Seems like a generic weakness as both cameras did it. And, just for your interest, I find the mode control wheel infuriating &#8211; about 50% of the time I take a shot and find that the wheel has slipped round a couple of places in handling the camera. I can take it again &#8211; but occasionally I miss an unrepeatable shot because of it. Is it so good a camera &#8211; or should I be packing upon Ricoh and going elsewhere this time round, notwithstanding the case and all those batteries?</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

